“Wicked: For Good” represents the conclusion of a two-part adaptation, raising questions about how sequels and franchise films fare in awards competition. Original standalone films traditionally receive more serious consideration than franchise installments.
The perception that sequels represent commercial calculation rather than artistic vision sometimes disadvantages them regardless of actual quality. Voters may undervalue franchise films as unoriginal even when they demonstrate creative excellence.
However, concluding chapters that successfully complete multi-film narratives deserve recognition for their distinctive achievements. Bringing story arcs to satisfying conclusions requires skill that differs from but equals initiating new narratives.
Some of cinema’s finest work exists within franchises and sequels, challenging assumptions about originality and artistic value. The quality of execution and emotional resonance matter more than whether films stand alone.
Awards recognition of franchise films validates their artistic legitimacy while acknowledging cinema’s evolving nature. As interconnected storytelling becomes more prevalent, awards must adapt to recognize excellence within these formats.
Sequel and Franchise Considerations in Awards Contexts
Date:
Picture credit: www.pexels.com